Q is for Quiddity
“For a long
time I couldn't make out what Aquinas meant. He uses a figurative word (a very
unusual thing for him) but I have solved it. Claritas is quidditas… This
is the moment which I call epiphany. First we recognise that the object is one
integral thing, then we recognise that it is an organised composite
structure, a thing in fact: finally, when the relation of the parts is
exquisite, when the parts are adjusted to the special point, we recognise that
it is that thing which it is. Its soul, its whatness, leaps to us from
the vestment of its appearance. The soul of the commonest object, the structure
of which is so adjusted, seems to us radiant. The object achieves its
epiphany.” – James Joyce, Stephen Hero
“MAMA!”
I reached for my
happy red plastic bifocals and looked at the clock. 5:56 a.m.
“Mama?”
Tess asked, peering at me from her eye level, an inch above the mattress on
which—until oh so very recently, I had been quietly and sweetly dreaming of a
small glass house in which to write Southern gothic novels and bake cantaloupe
and honeydew cupcakes topped with white chocolate-cardamom butter cream and
chiffonade of mint.
Good lord. I usually
need at least one cup of strong black coffee and a scone corner before we start
a conversation about quiddity and haecceity and hypokeimenon.
In philosophy, quiddity is identity or
"whatness," something's "what it is." It comes from the
scholastic Medieval Latin term quidditas, "essence," from quid,
"what." Quiddity describes properties a particular substance—like a
person—shares with others of its kind.
Unlike quiddity, “haecceity” denotes the discrete qualities, properties or
characteristics of a thing which make it a particular thing. Haecceity
is a person or object's "thisness,” referring to aspects of a thing that make it a particular
thing, while quiddity refers to the universal qualities of a thing, its
"whatness", those aspects of a thing that it shares with other things.
What
is my whatness? And yours? A fox has fox-ness, a crow has crow-ness, and we
have…what? What makes you you? Is it possible to answer that
question except as “you” is in relationship to other “you’s”?
Rarely, I imagine, is the word “quiddity” used in
an obituary (something to aspire to!); that of poet Ted Hughes’ was an
exception: “He wanted to capture not just live animals, but the aliveness of animals in their natural
state: their wildness, their quiddity,
the fox-ness of the fox and the crow-ness of the crow.”
Poets,
it would seem, are dipping pens into inkwells every morning after their black
coffee and scone corner to do just that: capture quiddity. Ironically, then, quiddity
itself is the essence of their work to capture quiddity, an infinite regress
of quiddities, a word that quite stops looking like itself once you write it a
few times.
Hypokeimenon is a term in metaphysics
that means the "underlying thing.” To search for the hypokeimenon is to
search for that substance that persists in a thing going through change—its
essential being. Conceptually similar to Spinoza’s "substance" and Kant’s
concept of the “noumenon” in The Critique
of Pure Reason, philosophers like George Berkeley attempted to discredit
the idea of any "underlying" substance which lay "behind"
appearances, arguing instead that appearances are the only true reality.
Whatness.
Quiddity.
Thingness.
Haecceity.
Unchanging
essence. Hypokeimenon.
What is my thingness?
What
is my underlying thing, that essence that doesn’t change? What makes me me?
Like
the foxes, what is my aliveness in my natural state: my wildness, my quiddity?
I figure I’ll save “hypokeimenon” until after her 5th birthday.
I walked downstairs with her hand in mine. "Hi, Worldie," she said sleepily as we passed the window on the stair landing.
"Let's make a huge big old pot of wonderful, hot coffee when we get to the kitchen," I said. "Want to?"
[painting by Magritte]
Patti, sorry it's taken me until Q to tell you how much I've been enjoying your alphabet series. Much food for thought, but Q really made me smile.
Posted by: Lydia | 28 August 2007 at 06:40
Just in case you ever wonder about people who leave a comment telling you how absolutely amazing you are....and then drop off and never come back again...we're still here. I still check in. I still laughed really hard about Billy. Call me. And wanted to hug you for it. I'm writing my own alphabet, inspired by you. Over there in your corner, you are making the world a better place. Don't ever doubt it. Casting all good thoughts through cyberspace....Amy
Posted by: Amy | 28 August 2007 at 08:05
Okay I'm definitely too tired to fully absorb this one. :) So I'll just say, well done...start the coffee...open the door...and greet it with a "Hi, Worldie." (Tess's slogan WILL appear on a piece of your jewelry...right?!) ;)
Posted by: Marilyn | 28 August 2007 at 09:10
Hi, Worldie. Indeed.
Posted by: Kikipotamus the Hobo | 28 August 2007 at 16:06
Kikipotamus the Hobo - It is one of my favorite things that she says - imagine if we all started our day that way! Let's!
Posted by: patti digh | 29 August 2007 at 22:21
Marilyn - I *wrote* it and am too tired to understand it! ;-) Now that you mention it, "Hi Worldie" is a great bracelet idea....!
Amy, Amy, Amy - wonderful to hear from you! Tell me, how many packages of frozen cranberries do you have in your freezer today? ;-) Your note really made my day - I've missed you... Billy *will* call someday. I can just feel it.
Lydia - thanks for telling me! I've enjoyed it, though I will admit some trepidation as we near "X". Any ideas? ;-)
Posted by: patti digh | 29 August 2007 at 22:25
Patti, patti, patti. Just want to sit and appreciate your intellect and the gigantic heart that goes along with it.
I read your posts in my reader every day, but coming over for coffee is ever so much more fun.
Please come stay in Santa Barbara. We'll find somewhere for you to lecture. In fact, I had a thought that this post would be great storytelling for a talk, and I've felt that way about many of your posts.
We've definitely "had it" with the blue suit stuff. Let's get real.
Posted by: Lisa Gates | 10 September 2007 at 12:35
Dutch, that's my whatness,"Wijk"is my hereness,I even boast a neither here nor thereness,in English of course, to prevent double dutchness.
Yet to be serious, your entertaining way of making a tricky bit of philosophy bearable is in my opinion sublime.
You come close to writing Aristotle and the art of perambulator maintenance
Posted by: Adriaan | 08 November 2007 at 18:48